Legal Opinion

Rath v. Rath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2016No. 20160006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Rath appeals from a district court order denying his motion for an order to show cause. Mark Rath asserted Kayla Rath, his former wife, should be held in contempt for violating the terms of their divorce judgment. The district court denied his motion. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Mark Rath and Kayla Rath were divorced in January 2013. Kayla Rath was awarded primary residential responsibility of the couple’s children, and Mark Rath was awarded supervised parenting time. This Court decided a number of appeals stemming from their divorce. See Rath v. Rath, 2016 ND 46, 876 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Berlin v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API