Legal Opinion
Solberg v. Inline Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 29, 1990No. Civ. 4-89-650PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Before the Court are motions filed by both plaintiffs and defendants in this putative class action. Plaintiffs move for class certification, and defendants seek summary judgment and attorney’s fees. Based on the files, records, proceedings, and oral ar guments herein, and for the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees is denied. In light of the disposition of defendants’ summary judgment motion, this Court need not address questions concerning the plaintiff class.
Inline Corporation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cruz v. Robert Abbey, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Wholesale & Retail Food Distribution Local 63 v. Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1993
- Warshun v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In Re Cargo, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1992
- Washington v. Aircap Industries Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.