Legal Opinion
In Re Cargo, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided February 28, 1992No. 19-00292PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM L. EDMONDS, Bankruptcy Judge.
In these proceedings, former employees 1 of the'debtor move for the allowance of their priority wage claims. The case trust ee has objected to the claims and has resisted the motion. 2 The trustee has moved for summary judgment. The employees have moved for partial summary judgment, asking the court to fix the priority status of the claims.
I
Former employees of Cargo, Inc. have filed wage claims under the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Act (WARN), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101 et seq. They ask that these claims be given priority…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re Powermate Holding Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Wholesale & Retail Food Distribution Local 63 v. Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1993
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. Hanlin Group, Inc. (In Re Hanlin Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Kitty Hawk International, Inc. (In Re Kitty Hawk, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.