Legal Opinion
Martin-Trigona v. Acton Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 13, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-3065PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants Acton Corporation (“Acton”), Acton Communications of Massachusetts (“ACM”), Acton Foodservices Corporation (“AFC”), and Gadsby & Hannah’s (“G & H”) motion to “Dismiss the Complaint as to' them and for Sanctions Against Plaintiff,” plaintiffs opposition thereto, and supplemental briefing on the motion; the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC” or the “Commission”) motion to dismiss, and the entire record herein. For the reasons outlined below, the Court grants defendants’ motions and dismisses…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Roy Stewart, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Paul MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bayles v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- National Federation of Federal Employees v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Jenkins v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Martin-Trigona v. Acton CorpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987