Legal Opinion

SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 25, 1984No. 796, Docket 83-7965PublishedCited by 220 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This is another in the new wave of cases involving “private civil RICO” — the private right of action found in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1982). Appeal is from a judgment, designated as final pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, I. Leo Glasser, Judge, dismissing the RICO claims in appellant’s amended complaint. 574 F.Supp. 963. We affirm.

Facts

This case involves business fraud. Plaintiff-appellant Sedima S.P.R.L. (Sedima) is a Belgian corporation in the…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API