Legal Opinion

State v. Duvall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1981No. 29PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

This is another of the three cases, arising out of the same hit- and-run accident in Dare County, which our Court decides today. See State v. Charles Fearing, 304 N.C. 471, 284 S.E. 2d 487 (1981); State v. Malcolm Fearing, 304 N.C. 499, 284 S.E. 2d 479 (1981). In pertinent part, we have already determined that the defendants in the Fearing cases, supra, must be tried again for error in the instructions on the essential elements of the hit-and-run offense *559under G.S. 20-166 because the judges did not correctly explain the element of the driver’s guilty knowledge. The Court of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. NeasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. WoolridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. FieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Iverson v. TM One, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API