State v. Fearing
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
By numerous assignments of error argued in his brief, defendant contends that the trial court erred in the admission of certain evidence, in denying his motions to dismiss, and in its in*473structions to the jury. After careful review we conclude that the trial court committed no prejudicial error in the death by vehicle case. In the hit-and-run case we conclude that the trial court erred in its jury instructions and that defendant is entitled to a new trial in that case.
1
The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motions to dismiss both…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Herchenbach v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- State v. MinkelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MooseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BogleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- McCown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.