Legal Opinion

Calloway v. Ford Motor Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1972No. 64PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

This Court has consistently held that “after the time for answering a pleading has expired,” an answer may not be amended as of right. A motion to amend is addressed to the discretion of the court, and its decision thereon is not subject to review except in case of manifest abuse. Vending Co. v. Turner, 267 N.C. 576, 148 S.E. 2d 581 (1966); Hardy v. Mayo, 224 N.C. 558, 31 S.E. 2d 748 (1944); Osborne v. Canton and Kinsland v. Mackey, 219 N.C. 139, 13 S.E. 2d 265 (1941); 6 N. C. Index Pleadings § 32 (1968). Although these cases were decided prior to the adoption of the new Rules…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Townsend v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. LangSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API