State v. McClure
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEANCH, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error Judge Hasty’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence of his alleged confession. Defendant contends that his alleged confession was involuntary because his intoxication prevented effectual waiver of his constitutional rights.
Pursuant to defendant’s motion to suppress, Judge Hasty properly held a voir dire hearing and heard evidence from both the State and defendant. On voir dire defendant testified that he had been drinking heavily for three weeks prior to 5 June 1970, and that because of his intoxication he remembered nothing about the events of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. GarciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.