Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1983No. 448A82PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

I

Guilt-Innocence Phase

Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s denial of his motion to permit individual voir dire of the jury venire, to sequester the jury venire during the voir dire proceedings, and to sequester the trial jury after selection was completed. This motion was apparently addressed to the trial judge after the jury selection process had been underway for one day.

In support of this assignment of error, defendant first takes the position that the trial judge was bound by a pretrial order entered by Judge Llewellyn, which provided for individual voir dire…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API