Legal Opinion
Alaska v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 8, 1995No. 92-314LPublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
The State of Aaska, plaintiff in this matter, seeks just compensation under the Fifth Amendment1 from the federal government for an alleged taking of property. In short, Aaska charges that the taking occurred as a result of federal statutory and regulatory restrictions on the export of her crude oil, denying her the full economic benefit of her property rights in such oil located beneath the surface of state-owned land. Defendant, the United States, has moved to dismiss said complaint for lack of jurisdiction on two grounds. In this regard, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- McCauley v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- in Winstar-Related Cases v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Moore v. Public Defenders OfficeUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Hoskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.