Legal Opinion
in Winstar-Related Cases v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 7, 1997No. Nos. 95-660 C, 95-730 C to 95-732 C, 95-737 C, 95-769 C, 95-773 C, 95-779 C, 95-782 C to 95-784 C, 95-787 C, 95-790 C, 95-792 C to 95-794 C, 95-797 C, 95-799 C to 95-801 C, 95-803 C to 95-805 C, 95-807 C, 96-108 C and 96-202 CPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Issue Judge.
Introduction
In United States v. Winstar Corp., — U.S. , 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996), the Supreme Court found the Federal Government liable to three savings and loan institutions for breach of contract stemming from Congress’s enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). The Court ruled that the United States had entered into contracts permitting the institutions to use special accounting methods in regard to their acquisition of certain failing savings and loan associations, that the new capital…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.