Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1893No. 16,720PublishedCited by 53 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

At the January term, 1892, of the Dubois Circuit Court, the appellee charged, by information, the appellants, France Hobbs, Daniel King, Samuel Spraggins, Thomas Smith, and five others, with the offense of riotous conspiracy as defined by what is known as the *405“ White-Cap Act.” On the 28th day of April, 1892, the court sustained a motion to quash the first count of the information, and, upon leave of the court, the prosecutor filed an amended first count, charging that at, etc., on, etc., the defendants did “ unlawfully and feloniously unite and combine together for the purpose of unlawfully…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Mergentheim v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. VaneNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Norton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API