Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Conoyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1897No. 18,182PublishedCited by 57 opinions

From the Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

The appellee recovered damages against appellant for injuries sustained by reason of one of its passenger trains colliding with him as he was passing over the company’s track, in a wagon, at a point where it intersects a public highway near the city of Vincennes. On change of venue, the case was tried in the Pike Circuit Court, and, over appellant’s motion for a new trial, a judgment was rendered in *526favor of appellee for the damages awarded by the jury.

The cause of action in controversy is based upon the alleged negligence of the appellant in omitting to give the statutory signals when the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Musgrave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Citizens' Street Railroad Co. of Indianapolis v. StoddardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API