Moter v. Hershey
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSheravood, J.
This is an action for strict foreclosure of a contract to sell real estate brought under sections 2914-2917, *495R. C. 1919. Judgment of cancellation was entered, new trial denied, and defendant has appealed from both the judgment and order denying a new trial: No. brief was filed by or on behalf of respondent.
The contract, so far as necessary to an understanding of this case, provided in substance:
“On the performance of the agreement by the party of the second part,” George E. Moter, first party, would deed to John) Hershey, second party, by a good and sufficient deed, a half section of land in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ink v. RohrigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Keator v. FergusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Speer v. PhillipsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Hickman v. LongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Hauert v. KaufmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walsh v. BellamySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Heinzman v. HowardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Hauert v. KaufmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Falde v. ChadwickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Halvorson v. BirklandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.