Legal Opinion

Falde v. Chadwick

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1949No. File No. 9034Published

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

Plaintiff brought suit under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Law, SDC 37.01, for a judgment confirming her attempt as vendor to invoke and enforce a forfeiture of the rights of defendant Guy E Chadwick as the purchaser under a contract for the sale of residential property in .the City of Mobridge. She sought also possession of the premises and damages from defendants for their withholding possession thereof after the filing of a declaration of forfeiture as by the terms of the contract provided.

The contract is in printed form and provides that if the purchaser shall make the required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Higinbotham v. FrockOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Silfvast v. AsplundMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Moter v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Benton v. DavisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API