Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Bellamy
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1942No. File No. 8338PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This is an action brought under SDC 37.31 for the strict foreclosure of a contract for the sale of real property. Defendant answered, setting up the defenses that the plaintiff failed and refused to comply with- the terms of the contract sought to be enforced and that defendant was not in default. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and rendered judgment decreeing that the rights asserted by the defendant under the contract be foreclosed, unless the defendant paid to the plaintiff the amount due on the contract and costs within ninety days after service of copy of the judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Security Savings Co. v. MackenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrington v. BirdsallNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Ink v. RohrigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Moter v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Richardson-Kellett Co. v. KlineSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Speck v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Speck v. First National Bank of Sioux FallsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1985
- In Re FaimanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1987
- Matter of ScanlanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
- Frank Seitzinger Farms, Inc. of Iowa v. WallerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.