Legal Opinion

Heinzman v. Howard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1984No. 14225PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

This is an action by Robert E. Heinzman (vendor) to foreclose a contract for deed against John Freeman Howard and Mary Jean Howard (vendees) and to set aside as fraudulent their quitclaim conveyance to the State Bank of Alcester (bank). The trial court ruled that it was immaterial whether the conveyance was fraudulent because the transfer did not obstruct any rights of the vendor under the contract for deed. The court further concluded the ven*148dor could not rescind the contract because he failed to act promptly to enforce his contractual rights. We affirm the circuit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pier v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Keator v. FergusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Speer v. PhillipsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Moter v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Orr v. AllenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shervold v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kroeplin Farms General Partnership v. Heartland Crop Insurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Heinzman v. HowardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Booth v. ChamalesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Heikkila v. CarverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API