Ink v. Rohrig
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Davison County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action by C. M. Ink and another against Henry Rohrigi Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs and appellants to seek to recover damages for breach of contract for the sale and purchase of land; it being alleged by plaintiffs that they entered into a written contract with the defendant to sell to defendant certain lands, that they had at all times been read}'- and willing to carry out 'said contract, and that they had tendered ab*549stract showing perfect title to the lands, as well as deed thereto running to defendant, and had duly performed all conditions of fcaid contract. They further alleged that the contract price of said land wa,s $40 per acre,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Parker v. ParmeleNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- Arnett v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Glenn v. . RosslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. FindleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hauert v. KaufmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Moter v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Walsh v. BellamySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Ontjes v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Cobb v. WillrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.