Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Courtney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 1938No. 26787PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Defendant .in error, Alonzo Price Courtney, as plaintiff below, filed his action against the plaintiffs in error, Oklahoma Natural Gas Company and Joe Gist, defendants below, for damages, and for convenience the parties will be designated as they appeared in the court below.
The plaintiff’s petition alleged that. Oklahoma Natural Gas Company was in the business of producing, transporting, and selling gas in the city of El Reno, Okla., and that Joe Gist was the servant, agent, and employee of said company, and acting within the scope of his employment, and Roy B. Smith was a licensed plumber of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. GrizzleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Kentucky Independent Oil v. Schnitzler, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrazzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- City of Altus v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Atherton v. DevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.