Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Garcia

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1950No. Civ. 17045PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant Los Angeles Transit Lines, following an order sustaining its demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint for personal injuries without leave to amend. Appellant recovered judgment by default against defendants Paul and C. M. Garcia in the sum of $25,000, which remains wholly unsatisfied.

Respondent corporation operates a general street railway system in Los Angeles, and maintains wooden poles adjacent to the curbing on Whittier Boulevard near the corner of Spence Street, as part of its system. Appellant was standing on the sidewalk near one of these poles…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. HickeySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Munsey v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tritsch v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. American Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API