Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. City of Benicia

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1892No. 14830PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

— This an action to abate a nuisance, and for damages. A demurrer was filed to the complaint, one of the grounds of which is, that it did not contain facts sufficient to show a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff declining to amend the complaint, judgment was given and made for the defendant, from which this appeal is taken.

It is plain that the alleged nuisance in this case arose from the prevention of the flow of surface water from, the defendant’s lot down to a swamp adjacent to the straits of Carquinez, by the raising of the grade of a street' of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Henderson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Waters v. Village of Bay ViewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Presentacion Ballesteras De Haley v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. O'Hara v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Stanford v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hume v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Adams v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API