Legal Opinion

Harman v. Franks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1936No. 25558PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Joseph Franks sued D. B. Harman and Cora E. Harman on account of a joint adventure under the style of a “Sheep Raising Agreement,” which was in effect a lease covering 320 acres of land owned by Joseph Franks. The contract provided for the raising of lambs on a fifty-fifty basis and the raising of grains on a fifty-fifty basis. The contract is only important for the purposes of this opinion in the particular that it recognized Joseph Franks as the owner of the land; and also in the particular that it bears upon the rights of the parties as evidence of their intention with respect to other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hurley v. AnickerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Helm v. RoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Snyder v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Share v. WILLIAMS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Oltman Homes, Inc. v. MirkesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Reid v. AuxierCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. McClellan v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Barham v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API