Reid v. Auxier
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
Two fundamental questions arise in this review. One, is a liquidated damages provision in a real estate sales agreement valid? Two, does the contract here prevent the sellers from pursuing any remedy provided by law? The trial court held that the liquidated damages clause in the parties’ sales contract was valid and prohibited plaintiffs from obtaining more than $2,500 for buyers’ refusal to close the sale.
We hold, however, that to the extent the liquidated damages agreement purports to be binding on either party it is against public policy and void. We further hold that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. VahlbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Harman v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Diehl v. WelshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fretwell v. Protection Alarm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Oltman Homes, Inc. v. MirkesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Fisher v. SchmelingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- North American Investment Co. v. LawsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- 1414 PARTNERSHIP v. TaveauCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.