Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1937No. 27095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

This is an ¡appeal from the district court of Woods county, wherein G. B. and Marie McClellan, plaintiffs in error herein, were plaintiffs, and Stella Smith individually and as administratrix of the estate of Prank E. Smith, deceased, was defendant, defendant in error herein. Judgment was for defendant on her cross-petition, and plaintiffs appeal.

The suit was for possession of certain land, and the defendant in her answer asked for cancellation of a certain deed executed by the said Prank Smith on April 13, 1931, in favor of plaintiff Marie McClellan, which is the basis of plaintiffs’ cause…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tolon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Tittle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Cousins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Harman v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Smith v. Fourth Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Griffin v. MaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API