Legal Opinion

Miller v. Enzor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 7313SC19PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

The evidence offered by plaintiff is conflicting in many respects. However, on a motion by a defendant for a directed verdict, the plaintiff’s evidence must be taken in the light most favorable to him and he is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom. Dawson v. Jennette, 278 N.C. 438, 180 S.E. 2d 121; Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47.

The testimony of David Earl Simmons, when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, tends to show the following: At about dusk on the afternoon of 5 April 1969, Simmons,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Dawson v. JennetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Jernigan v. ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Radford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Sidden v. Talbert Ex Rel. TalbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Adkins v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Miller v. EnzorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Simmons v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API