Sidden v. Talbert Ex Rel. Talbert
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
Defendants assign as error the failure of the trial court to grant their motions for a directed verdict.
Upon defendants’ motion for directed verdict “[a] 11 the evidence which tends to support plaintiff’s claim must be taken as true and considered in its light most favorable to plaintiff, giving [him] the benefit of every reasonable inference which legitimately may be drawn therefrom. . . . Contradictions, conflicts and inconsistencies are resolved in plaintiff’s favor. (Citations omitted.)” Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 365-66, 168 S.E. 2d 47, 49. Miller v. Enzor, 17 N.C. App.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. . CadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Teachey v. WoolardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Miller v. EnzorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Town of Wake ForestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Sykes v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983