Legal Opinion

Sidden v. Talbert Ex Rel. Talbert

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1974No. 7423DC664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

Defendants assign as error the failure of the trial court to grant their motions for a directed verdict.

Upon defendants’ motion for directed verdict “[a] 11 the evidence which tends to support plaintiff’s claim must be taken as true and considered in its light most favorable to plaintiff, giving [him] the benefit of every reasonable inference which legitimately may be drawn therefrom. . . . Contradictions, conflicts and inconsistencies are resolved in plaintiff’s favor. (Citations omitted.)” Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 365-66, 168 S.E. 2d 47, 49. Miller v. Enzor, 17 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. . CadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Teachey v. WoolardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Miller v. EnzorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Town of Wake ForestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Sykes v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API