Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ault

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2006No. 2006-0441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Jerry Edwin Ault of Mansfield, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0008445, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1978. Since June 1, 2000, respondent has served as a judge of the Mansfield Municipal Court. Respondent was elected to a second term in November 2005 and is currently the presiding judge.

{¶ 2} On December 6, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with four counts of professional misconduct stemming from respondent’s abuse of prescription painkilling drugs. The parties stipulated that respondent had violat*208ed provisions of the Code of Judicial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. LinnenOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. GernertOhio Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API