Legal Opinion

Estate of Hinds

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1970No. Civ. 35837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J.

—On October27, 1967, James Hinds and H. Douglas Gamble entered into a written agreement under which Hinds was to purchase from Gamble 40,000 shares of the stock of Little Revenge, Inc., for $79,000. This constituted all of the stock of Little Revenge, Inc. The only asset of that corporation was a 5 3-foot sailboat named, logically enough, “Little Revenge.” What Hinds actually purchased was the boat and, according to the evidence, the agreement provided for the purchase and sale of corporate stock so that he could avoid paying a sales tax.

The agreement further provided that, on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Greve v. Leger, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Goldstein v. PrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. BeedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. In Re CopelandDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Hale v. Kontaratos (In Re Kontaratos)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1981
  4. Geary Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API