Legal Opinion

Geisdorf v. Doughty

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1998No. 970181PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

Defendant Mary Doughty appeals from a judgment entered against her and in favor of plaintiff William H. Geisdorf stemming from a dispute over a lease agreement between the parties. Doughty contends the trial court erroneously stated the law in the jury instructions. She seeks (1) reversal of the judgment entered below on the jury verdict and (2) a new trial to address her counterclaim. Geisdorf cross-appeals, seeking a remand to the trial court for clarification and .resolution of his claim against Doughty for an alleged breach of contract.

BACKGROUND

In August of 1992,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Plateau Mining Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Utah Coal & Lumber Restaurant, Inc. v. Outdoor Endeavors UnlimitedUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. CCD, L.C. v. MillsapUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. McCleve Properties, LLC v. D. Ray Hult Family Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API