Legal Opinion

Polhamus v. Roberts

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1946No. 4977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

This action in ejectment was instituted by plaintiffs (appellees) to recover from defendant possession of certain real estate situated in Roswell, New Mexico, and to recover damages for its retention. Defendant claims the right to possession under an alleged lease from plaintiffs. 'From a judgment for plaintiffs defendant has prosecuted’this appeal.

The facts necessary to a decision are substantially as follows:

The property in question is owned one-half by the plaintiff, Birdie Polhamus, and the other one-half by plaintiffs Norma Jane Savage and Martha Lee Savage, who are minors…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Shubert Theatrical Co. v. RathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cillessen v. Kona CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Tatsch v. Hamilton-Erickson Manufacturing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Pickett v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Ross v. RingsbyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API