Legal Opinion
Pam, S.P.A. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 24, 2009No. 2009-1066PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
Appellant PAM, S.p.A. (“PAM”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) concerning pasta imported into the United States by PAM. The CIT affirmed a remand determination issued by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in compliance with the CIT’s earlier order directing Commerce to explain and recalculate an adverse-facts-available (“AFA”) antidumping margin, which had been corroborated in accordance with 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(e). Because the 45.49% AFA margin assessed against PAM is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.
I…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Gallant Ocean (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Kyd, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Papierfabrik August Koehler Se v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- BMW of N. Am. LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.