Legal Opinion
Morgan Hill Unified School District v. Amoroso
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1988No. H002134PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
1. Introduction
Plaintiffs Morgan Hill Unified School District and Morgan Hill Unified School District School Building Corporation brought this action in October *10851985 to validate their proposed issuance and sale of $3.75 million worth of bonds for additions and improvements to a high school. The high school was constructed pursuant to approval by local voters in 1972. Defendant Fred Amoroso responded to this action as a taxpayer. Plaintiffs appeal from the court’s determination after trial that the voters in November 1972 did not authorize the construction now…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Las Virgenes Municipal Water District v. DorgeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Angell v. Peterson Tractor, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Cal. Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Constr., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- California High-Speed Rail Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.