Legal Opinion
Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1995No. 93-55768, 93-55850PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant/Cross-Appellee Martin Jimeno appeals the district court’s judgment as a matter of law in favor of Appellee/Cross-Appellant Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) on Jimeno’s claim of employment discrimination because of a physical disability, in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal.GoVt Code §§ 12920-12940. The district court found that Jimeno had established a prima facie case of discrimination, but it held that section 301(a) of the federal Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), preempts…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Alaska Airlines v. Judy SchurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Su Humble v. Boeing Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Spero Saridakis v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lorraine Detabali v. St. Luke's Hospital John Williams Philip Gardner Christine Green Evangeline Mondares Susan McCorquodale Rose ReneeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.