Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Donahue-Birran

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 2004No. 02-02926; A120639PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioners University of Oregon and SAIF (SAIF) seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) upholding an assessment of impairment under OAR 436-035-0230(16), as well as a penalty imposed pursuant to ORS 656.268(5)(e). At issue is the meaning of the phrase, “cannot walk and/or stand for a cumulative total of more than two hours in an 8-hour period,” as used in OAR 436-035-0230(16). We review for errors of law, and affirm.

Claimant compensably injured his knee in April 2001, and SAIF originally accepted a knee strain, then later expanded its acceptance to include other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and PerlenfeinOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. TollefsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. C. J. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Godinez v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Manchester Solar, LLC v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. SAIF Corporation v. MiguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API