Legal Opinion

Cascade Physical Therapy v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 2013No. 0900090H; A148032; 0900015H; A148033; 0900016H; A148034; 0900107H; A148036; 0900009H; A148037; 0900085H; A148039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

This case involves a medical fee dispute in which Cascade challenges the fees paid by insurer for medical services that Cascade provided to injured workers between January 2006 and May 2008.1 Cascade seeks judicial review of a final order in which the director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) concluded, after a contested case hearing, that insurer was not required to pay Cascade any additional amounts for the medical services at issue.2 On review, Cascade asserts that the director reached that conclusion based on an erroneous interpretation of OAR 436-009-0040(1)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. SAIF Corp. v. Donahue-BirranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Reid v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. SAIF Corporation v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Back in Action Physical Therapy v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API