Legal Opinion

Bussemer v. Artwire Creations, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

In this patent infringement suit the defendant moves and the plaintiffs cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side acknowledging there is no triable issue of fact, and further that the patent claim and prior art are, without expert aid, readily understandable.1

Plaintiff Bussemer, the patentee, together with his two co-plaintiffs, are the owners of Patent 3,083,836, issued April 2, 1963. The patent, in general, pertains to an entire integrated rack structure to-be utilized'in refrigerator freezer compartments…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merry Hull & Company v. Hi-Line Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Davis Harvester Co. v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API