Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 2005No. C022718CR; A120856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction on eight counts of identity theft and one count of unlawful use of a computer. At trial, the court disallowed his demurrer to the indictment under the identity theft statute, ORS 165.800, concluding that it did not violate the free speech guarantees in the Oregon and United States constitutions. The court also denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of his apartment. We affirm.

A demurrer based on Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution amounts to an assertion that the Legislative Assembly exceeded its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. GarciasOregon Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mandujano-Real v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Pena v. Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  3. State v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API