Legal Opinion
State v. Plowman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1992No. CC C89-12-36912; CA A65145; SC S38328PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
INTRODUCTION
The issue in this case is the constitutional validity of ORS 166.165(l)(a)(A), the statute that creates and defines the crime of intimidation in the first degree. 1 Defendant and three codefendants were charged with violating ORS 166.165(l)(a)(A), which makes it a crime for two or more persons, acting together, to “[intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause physical injury to another because of their perception of that person’s race, color, religion, national origin or sexual orientation.” Defendant demurred on the grounds that the statute is vague and that it burdens his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. M.S.California Supreme Court · 1995
- State Of Iowa Vs. Mark Thomas HenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.