Legal Opinion
Mandujano-Real v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2008No. 06-74186PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether a conviction for identity theft under Oregon Revised Statute- § 165.800 is a conviction for an aggravated felony theft offense for the purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). We hold that it is not.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Petitioner, Miguel Mandujano-Real, is a thirty-three year old native and citizen of Mexico. He entered the United States at the age of six. In 1989, at the age of fourteen, he became a lawful permanent resident.
In March 2006, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ana Maria Lanza v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jose Medina-Lara v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Restrepo v. Attorney General of USCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Fregozo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Joe BenallyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.