Legal Opinion
Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction Belmont Correctional Institution
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 2, 2004No. 2:00-CV-774PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification pur*469suant to the Sixth Circuit’s remand order issued upon resolution of the interlocutory appeal of Defendant Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correetions/Belmont Correctional Institute (“BeCI”).
The Plaintiffs, Rachel Reeb, Verna Brown, Glenna Mackey, and Jill Beabout, are all employees at BeCI in St. Clairsville, Ohio, who have brought a sex discrimination claim under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rachel Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Belmont Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Rachel Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Belmont Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Rachel Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Belmont Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Reeb v. OH Dept RehabCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006