Rachel Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Belmont Correctional Institution
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentKeith, Circuit Judge
I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s holding. The majority improperly holds that the plaintiffs, female corrections officers, who claim that their employer Belmont Correctional Institution discriminated against them, based on their sex, cannot bring a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2) to collectively enforce the rights and remedies afforded for such violations under both the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 *652U.S.C. § 1981a, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e.
Rejecting the majority’s analysis, I would affirm the district court and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.