Legal Opinion
Rachel Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Belmont Correctional Institution
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2006No. 04-3994Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
435 F.3d 639
Rachel REEB, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, Belmont Correctional Institution, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-3994.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: October 26, 2005.
Decided and Filed: January 24, 2006.
ARGUED: Stephen P. Carney, Office of the Attorney General of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Nicholas E. Kennedy, Kennedy, Reeve & Knoll, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Stephen P. Carney, Douglas R. Cole, Office of the Attorney General of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, Jack W. Decker, Columbus, Ohio, for…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Batchelder; Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.