Legal Opinion
Rachel Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Belmont Correctional Institution
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2006No. 04-3994PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Four named female employees of the Belmont Correctional Institution (“Belmont”), a prison operated by the State of Ohio, filed a class action against Belmont and certain officials under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that female corrections officers have been treated differently from similarly situated male corrections officers and accordingly have been denied promotions, denied leave and overtime, given undesirable positions, and replaced by men. The plaintiffs specifically requested money damages and an injunction, though they did not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Nafziger v. McDermott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Beattie v. CenturyTel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Aerel, S.R.L. v. Pcc Airfoils, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.