Sandgathe v. Jagger
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing with prejudice his legal malpractice action against his former criminal defense attorney. He contends that, under the reasoning of Stevens v. Bispham, 316 Or 221, 851 P2d 556 (1993), the court erred in dismissing the action with prejudice rather than without prejudice. We reverse.
Plaintiffs malpractice action arises out of two criminal proceedings in which defendant represented plaintiff. The first involved an incident in 1992 in which plaintiff assaulted his dentist. Following a jury trial in May 1993, plaintiff was convicted of assault in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Hartung v. UnanderOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Houston v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wallace v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Cornus Corp. v. Geac Enterprise Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Rawls v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.