Legal Opinion

Cornus Corp. v. Geac Enterprise Solutions, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 3, 2012No. 075382L3; A146476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Plaintiff filed an action in state court for damages arising out of a software sales contract with defendants. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs case, ruling that it was barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Previously, a federal district court had dismissed a similar action by plaintiff under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 41(b) for plaintiff’s negligent failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff appeals the dismissal, contending that, under Oregon law governing the preclusive effect of the prior federal judgment, it is entitled to proceed in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Wallace v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Hawkins v. 1000 Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Wall v. AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Wall v. AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API