Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 2002No. H023966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, J.
Introduction
In this petition for a writ of mandate, the People seek to vacate the trial court’s order granting real party in interest, defendant Angelica Natasha Martinez, probation and drug treatment under Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. Defendant was granted drug treatment and probation after she pleaded guilty to nonviolent drug possession offenses and admitted having a 1987 prior strike conviction. According to the People, defendant was not eligible for drug treatment and probation because she has a 1987 prior strike conviction and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. Superior Court (Dorsey)California Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. SUPERIOR COURT (TURNER)California Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Orange Catholic Found. v. Arvizu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. BarrosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Orange Catholic Foundation v. ArvizuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018