Legal Opinion

People v. SUPERIOR COURT (TURNER)

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2002No. B156011PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, Acting P. J.

In the November 2000 General Election, the voters of California adopted Proposition 36, an initiative measure entitled “Drugs, Probation and Treatment Program.” Proposition 36, codified in Penal Code section 1210 et seq., 1 provides that an individual convicted of a “nonviolent drug possession offense” (§ 1210.1, subd. (a)) shall be sentenced to probation and ordered to complete a court-supervised drug treatment program in lieu of incarceration. (Ibid.) The probation and drug treatment program is generally inapplicable to individuals who have suffered prior serious…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. HumphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. In Re DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re VarnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. SUPERIOR COURT (HENKEL)California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. In Re OgeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API