Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Dorsey)

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1996No. E018366PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

In this matter the People challenge the trial court’s decision to place defendant and real party in interest Donald C. Dorsey on probation, although as a result of his convictions he is presumptively ineligible. They also complain of the trial court’s failure to impose a restitution fine and to consider costs under a tax statute of which Dorsey was convicted. We have determined that the matter must be remanded for resentencing.

Facts of the Case

There is no dispute over the essential facts of the case. Donald C. Dorsey, defendant in the criminal proceedings below (and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. HagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. HooverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API