Moore v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Paul Roger Moore seeks a writ of mandate, contending he is eligible for probation under Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. (Pen. Code, §§ 1210, 1210.1, 3063.1; Health & Saf. Code, § 11999.4 et seq.)1 Proposition 36 requires the court to grant probation and drug treatment to any defendant convicted of a nonviolent drug possession offense and prohibits incarceration as a condition of probation. (§ 1210.1, subd. (a).)
However, as relevant here, Proposition 36 shall not apply to a defendant previously convicted of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004